February 10, 2012

Setting Clearer Performance Expectations

Setting Clearer Performance Expectations

The annual performance review.

Stating this phrase guarantees some reaction for anyone who has ever had one, or had to give one as a supervisor or manager. In my experience in working with organizations, that reaction is seldom positive.

The concept behind the performance review or evaluation is a good one. It is a chance for someone to discuss their accomplishments, get feedback on their progress, and build a plan for continuous improvement. The idea makes sense, which is why every organization I’ve worked with has these meetings between a supervisor and an employee.

Unfortunately, while the idea is sound, far too often, in execution, these meetings are ineffective at best, and counter-productive at worst. While there are many reasons why this is true, one of those reasons is that supervisors don’t know how to do one of the most critical parts of this event effectively – setting clear performance expectations.

Without clear expectations from the previous year, the discussion becomes too subjective – one of the major (justified) reasons employees don’t find these reviews valuable. Without clear expectations set for the coming year, people don’t know what to work on throughout the year, beyond vague generalities or assumptions. This then sets them up for yet another largely subjective review next year.

Some Criteria

These expectations should be:

- Connected to the goals and objectives of the organization

- Clear and agreed upon

- Developed jointly

Applying these three criteria to the expectations you set during these meetings will improve the relevancy and clarity of the expectations. And by jointly developing them you improve the commitment of the employee to both the process and the expectations themselves.

Getting There

Once you know what successful expectations will look like with the criteria, the next question becomes, “how do we get there?” Here are some tips to help you identify, clarify and agree to performance expectations.

1. Start with organizational goals. Help the employee understand department and organizational goals. Discuss how their work can positively impact the achievement of those goals. Use that perspective to develop any performance expectations that directly link their work to those goals.

2. Ask questions. One of the biggest mistakes you can make during a performance review meeting is to do all of the talking. Get the employee to discuss their expectations and goals for the coming year. Start by asking questions – especially open ended ones. Perhaps you have some very specific things you want to include – you can add your items later in the conversation. Ask first and ask often.

3. Be quiet. If you are going to ask… you have to be quiet and listen. Be patient. They might not have an immediate thought – or they may be scared to say much if this is a different approach than they have experienced in these situations before. Ask the questions expectantly, rephrase them if needed, be patient and keep your mouth shut. If you are going to jointly create these expectations, you have to let them talk.

4. Acknowledge their feelings and perspective. You may not agree with everything they say. You may see their proposed expectations missing the mark slightly. Remember this is a conversation. Don’t judge too quickly. Even if you want to influence them to a different view, acknowledge how they feel, even if your feeling is different.

5. Challenge them to stretch. One of the best things we can do for people is encourage them to stretch their performance. Help people raise their expectations a little bit more. How do you know it is a stretch? When is feels like a challenge, but isn’t unbelievable. Setting expectations of improvement levels that people can’t visualize achieving is likely beyond a stretch. Set expectations that raise the bar a little – and that drive people towards their potential.

6. Be specific and descriptive. The expectations need to be descriptive and clear. If they are vague, they are open to interpretation and won’t be met to anyone’s satisfaction. Make them specific and write them down.

7. Restate and clarify. The meeting can’t end until you have agreement on the expectations, and you can’t get agreement unless they are clear. Review the notes that have been written down, and make sure that you both agree that they say want you want them to say, and that when you both read them in 2 days or 2 months, that they will still mean the same thing.

8. Gain agreement. Get people to commit to the expectations that have been created. Give space for them to share concerns or frustrations, but leave with a commitment to work towards these expectations. Your organization may want people to sign their performance reviews or plans. Beyond those requirements, having people sign their expectations and agreements is a powerful piece of people committing to achieve something. So consider having people sign, even if it isn’t a part of your organization’s process.

Taking these steps will help you create job expectations that will meet both the organization’s and the individual’s needs. It will also be a springboard to helping make those performance reviews more valuable – for everyone.

Final Note

Perhaps as you read this list you didn’t see anything earth-shattering or new. If so, my question to you is – are you doing all of these things, even though you know them?

About the Author

Kevin Eikenberry is Chief Potential Officer of The Kevin Eikenberry Group (http://KevinEikenberry.com), a learning consulting company that helps Clients reach their potential through a variety of training, consulting and speaking services. To receive your free special report on “Unleashing Your Potential” go to http://www.kevineikenberry.com/uypw/index.asp or call us at (317) 387-1424 or 888.LEARNER.

Managing Rebellious Employees

Managing Rebellious Employees

Surveys of executives reveal that many companies fall short of their profit objectives due to “people problems.” Research for my Absolutely Fabulous Organizational Change book found these “people problems” fall into two “r” categories: rebellion and resistance.

Rebellion is akin to teenagers defying authority figures, fir instance, rebelling against leaders who institute change. Resistance includes employees flinging roadblocks in the way of the organizational change. Examples include employees slowing down their work pace, badmouthing the change behind leaders’ backs, making spiteful comments about the leaders, and slashing productivity.

Feels Like a Lover or Spouse Just Walked Out on You

One of my prouder moments in the media spotlight occurred when I appeared on business television shows — and also was quoted in national magazines — concerning employees’ emotional reactions to organizational change. I had just delivered a speech on the topic at a national convention. At the press conference after my speech, reporters snapped to attention and later quoted me when I said the following: “The major emotional reaction of employees during organizational change is that they feel like their spouse or lover just walked out on them!”

Why did my statement attract media attention? Because I summarized the emotionally charged sting of betrayal everyone has felt for various reasons. Employees showing difficulty handling change often feel betrayed. They get used to everything at work being done in a certain way. But all of a sudden, if a company (or spouse or lover) changes how it acts, the person feels a huge sense of loss, distrust, and betrayal.

7 Methods to Handle Resistant Employees

My research on executives who lead highly profitable organizational change uncovered the seven most useful methods to handle resistant employees:

a. communicate reasons for change

b. terminate

c. involve employees in decision-making

d. incentive pay

e. insist employees achieve quantified objectives within deadlines

f. teamwork that creates peer pressure to “get with the program”

g. celebrate successes to help employees feel proud and emotionally “bond”

“Old-Style” Versus “New-Style” Employees

Another bottom line concern: Employees who worked productively before the organizational change may be unproductive after the change is implemented. I call them “old-style” and “new-style” employees. I find the following vital differences:

Old-Style Employees: Works in 1 department, Solo work, Likes receiving direction, Prefers to be told what to do, and Focus: Seniority & experience.

New-Style Employees: Interdepartmental, Teamwork, Likes ndependence, Prefers shared leadership, and Focus: Updating & expanding skills.

For example, at Excell Global Services, vice president Lori Ulichnie used four methods to transform old-style employees into the new-style employees needed to implement Excell’s highly profitable organizational changes:

a. Incentive pay

b. Thrill of employees receiving executives’ attention

c. Clear business strategy

d. “Communicate 500 Times” — continually repeating Excell’s strategy to employees.

Shoot the Dissenters

Another way to handle resistant employees was colorfully stated when I delivered my Absolutely Fabulous Organizational Change™ presentation at a company’s management retreat. At one point during my presentation, an executive stood and dramatically announced: “As our organization undergoes major organizational changes, we always seek to cure the wounded. But, we will shoot the dissenters!”

Every manager in my workshop remained silent for a few moments. Then, they all burst out laughing. Reason: They recognized the wisdom of what they heard. Some rebellious and resistant employees simply need to be de-employed. After all, a company’s purpose is to prosper — not to run a counseling center for rebellious employees.

Hire the Best

Importantly, a fantastic way to avoid employee problems in times of change is to not hire employees who could become problem employees! As I always ask in my workshops and speeches on Hire the Best — & Avoid the Rest™, “What’s the fastest, cheapest and easiest way to have productive and dependable employees?” My answer: “Hire people who are productive and dependable human beings!!” Superior hiring methods often include evaluating applicants using customized tests and interviews.

About the Author

Michael Mercer, Ph.D., is a consultant, speaker, and founder of The Mercer Group, Inc. in Barrington, Illinois. He delivers speeches and seminars at conferences and corporations. Dr. Mercer’s “Abilities & Behavior Forecaster™” pre-employment tests are used by companies across North America. He authored “Hire the Best — & Avoid the Rest™” and also “Absolutely Fabulous Organizational Change™”. You can subscribe to his FREE e-Newsletter at http://www.DrMercer.com or call him at (847) 382-0690. © Copyright 2005, Michael Mercer, Ph.D.